A Catalog of Civic Data Use Cases
How can data and analytics be used to enhance city operations?
What kinds of operations-enhancing questions have cities asked and answered with data and analytics? The catalog below is an ongoing, regularly-updated resource for those interested in knowing what specific use cases can be addressed using more advanced data and analysis techniques.
For examples that are currently being implemented in cities across the country, you can click to expand the question to see additional information about the solution. All other examples represent potential questions that cities could work to address with data and analytics.
We welcome further submissions to the list by email. Submissions can include either current examples of how cities are addressing specific operational or policy issues with data, or ideas for how to address issues that you hope cities will one day be able to answer.
Health & Human Services
The city of Houston has a comprehensive approach to identifying which days present public health concerns and then communicating that to residents. Following this model, cities should first use data analysis to examine historical ambulance and pollution data to identify when high pollution correlates with health emergencies like asthma attacks. Next, they can create a dedicated alert system based on Houston's "Asthma Air Aware Day Warning," that issues alerts when air conditions match historically problematic pollution levels.
To maximize reach, cities should integrate these alerts into established emergency warning systems like AlertHouston. Engaging healthcare partners is also crucial—cities can work with medical providers and emergency departments to sign up for alerts so they can prepare for increased patient volumes. Building resident participation through active recruitment to opt into the alert system is equally important, as is planning for system expansion and pairing alerts with asthma and air quality education. Houston's model demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach, having signed up 37,000 residents with plans for continued expansion and educational efforts.
City leaders can leverage multiple data sources to understand urban heat impacts, including emergency department visits and hospitalizations for heat-related illnesses, mortality data from death certificates, and chronic respiratory stress indicators like asthma-related ED visits. Place-based data such as satellite thermal imaging, green space and tree canopy coverage, and power outage reports help identify urban heat islands and infrastructure vulnerabilities within specific neighborhoods. Additionally, demographic data including heat vulnerability indices and the CDC's Social Vulnerability Index enable cities to map vulnerable populations and target interventions to the communities most at risk from extreme heat.
City leaders can implement multiple policy and infrastructure solutions to address extreme heat, including expanding green spaces and shade structures, enhancing urban design for cooling, and using reflective surfaces and blue-green infrastructure to combat urban heat island effects. To effectively execute these strategies, mayors should look at successful examples from other cities, including appointing a designated heat officer, building cross-agency teams, developing comprehensive plans combining emergency response with long-term mitigation efforts, and mapping heat hotspots to target investments in historically redlined and vulnerable communities. Additionally, cities should protect extra-sensitive populations through regulations and partnerships, educate residents and staff about heat risks, incentivize sustainable building practices, and pursue federal funding for capital projects that increase urban resilience and reduce health disparities.
-
Who is most likely to apply for a city service(s)?
-
What is the impact of providing an additional service(s) to a client already receiving one city service?
-
Which clients are most likely to apply for multiple services?
-
When clients apply for / obtain multiple services, which service do they typically apply for first?
-
Can we forecast the number of caseloads for city services?
A surprising fact is that most exposure to outdoor air pollution actually takes place indoors. Mayors can address indoor air quality (IAQ) by treating clean indoor air as core infrastructure, and in conjunction with overall efforts to reduce air pollution. Schools are an important starting point, since students are particularly vulnerable to air pollution and spend the majority of time in school settings. They can use their convening power, funding decisions, and policy tools to install high-efficiency filters and upgrade outdated HVAC systems in schools and public buildings.
Beyond schools, mayors can leverage sustainability initiatives to support electrification incentive programs, such as heat pump installations for homeowners, which improve indoor air quality through advanced filtration systems. They can also partner with school districts, nonprofits, and hospitals to prevent asthma and reduce absenteeism through enhanced ventilation. Additionally, mayors can direct funding toward green infrastructure and HVAC training programs and allocate resources to improve ventilation in daycare and after-school facilities. Examples include Mayor Alex Morse of Holyoke dedicating CARES Act funding for classroom HEPA filters and Mayor Michelle Wu of Boston's Community Clean Air Grant program, which has provided induction cook tops to replace gas stoves in homes of residents with asthma. By prioritizing IAQ as essential infrastructure, mayors can improve public health, reduce sick days, boost academic performance, and strengthen their cities' sustainability goals.
Cities can build equitable heat resilience by combining hyperlocal heat mapping data with direct community engagement and targeted service provision. Boston's approach began with citizen scientists collecting air temperature and humidity data at street level—capturing what residents actually feel rather than relying solely on satellite data. The city then paired this data with community partnerships to identify and serve vulnerable populations most affected by extreme heat.
Boston worked with community organizations, medical centers, and neighborhood associations to distribute 400 air conditioning units and 700 box fans to older adults and people with heat-sensitive health conditions. The city expanded these efforts through the Cool Spaces Program, which provides shade, misting tents, and seating at 11 library locations in historically underserved neighborhoods, while also offering complementary social services like free meals and rental assistance.
Additionally, Boston engaged community ambassadors in listening sessions to understand how different neighborhoods experience heat, ensuring that interventions reflect community needs. By combining citizen science data collection, hyperlocal temperature mapping, and authentic community partnerships, Boston created a model where residents serve as both data collectors and advocates in shaping heat resilience strategies.
-
How do we help clients leaving foster care, homeless shelters, etc. get and keep jobs?
-
Which clients coming out of the juvenile justice, criminal justice, foster care, homeless services, or substance abuse systems who are placed in employment are most likely to return to city services?
-
Which interventions are most effective?
-
Which individuals and families placed into permanent housing are most at risk of returning to the homeless services system?
-
Which public housing residents are most likely to be placed into employment?
-
Which city services have the greatest impact on reducing entry into homeless shelters?
-
Which client characteristics indicate that a client will leave a homeless shelter without a subsidy?
-
Which clients would benefit the most from housing services?
-
Which seniors in need of services and resources currently aren't receiving them?
Cities can use predictive analytics to better target limited rental assistance by building models that estimate who is most likely to become homeless after an eviction. Allegheny County’s Department of Human Services did this by integrating data from its countywide Data Warehouse, which includes information on homelessness history, public benefit use, child welfare, substance use disorder, and other human services. Working with data scientists from Carnegie Mellon University, they used known risk indicators and triggers like eviction filings to predict which households were most likely to become unhoused and then prioritized those residents for outreach and assistance, including through existing touch points such as child welfare workers and community partners. The model also helped distinguish who could avoid homelessness with financial aid alone and who needed more intensive supports (for example, people entering the mental health crisis system). Early results suggest that many people who received assistance through this targeted approach remain stably housed, showing how analytics can stretch limited funds to where they have the greatest impact.
Regulation
- Can we determine where unsafe housing problems are unlikely to be reported through 311?
- How can we use analytics to prioritize accessibility inspections for building alterations, and make sure they are compliant with municipal building code and state accessibility requirements?
- Who is most likely to be guilty of financial crimes and fraud?
- How can inspectors reduce response time to maintenance complaints?
-
How can we prioritize annual elevator safety inspections? For example, can we predict or identify which elevators pass every year and could be outsourced to a 3rd party?
-
Which construction / renovation projects are the highest risk / should be inspected first?
-
Which equipment (such as boilers, elevators, cranes, vehicles, etc.) is the highest risk / should be inspected first?
-
What variables affect inspector productivity and which can be most easily influenced? What distinctions can be made between inspectors who complete a high number of inspections and those who are at the bottom end?
-
Based on the relationship between inspections and violations, what building inspection regimens are most effective at preventing violations from occuring?
-
How many inter-agency inspections are conducted each year? Do they effectively detect current violations?
-
Which city debts are least likely to be paid?
-
Which taxpayers are least like to pay?
-
What city blocks need more inspection enforcement?
-
Which businesses are most likely to be violating weights and measures?
-
How can we tap social media for information on illegal businesses?
-
What property owners, architects, developers, businesses, and landlords need more regulatory enforcement?
-
How can we use social media to ensure licenses are conducting legal business?
-
How can we target stores that sell outdated food or expired baby formula?
-
Does the order of inspections (building, health, or fire) increase the rate of violation?
Cities can modernize their permitting and inspection systems through a combination of digital technology, process re-engineering, and cultural change. Digitizing submissions allows multiple reviewers to examine plans simultaneously rather than sequentially, enabling faster identification of missing items and plan revisions. Online application systems eliminate the need for in-person visits, significantly reducing lobby traffic. Cities should also authorize inspectors to conduct multiple inspections at once and implement online scheduling for next-day services. Critically, cities must shift from an adversarial approach to a collaborative partnership with the development community and prioritize customer service as a key performance indicator.
San Antonio successfully implemented this integrated approach, reducing processing times and receiving positive feedback from both large developers and homeowners. When technology, process improvements, and a customer-focused culture evolve together, efficiency and resident satisfaction naturally follow.
Mobility
- How can we reduce accidents involving city vehicles? Where and when do most accidents involving city vehicles occur?
- How should cities prepare for autonomous vehicles?
Infrastructure
Cities should test assumptions about popular safety concepts through rigorous data analysis before widespread implementation. NYC DOT's approach to daylighting — prohibiting parking adjacent to crosswalks to increase visibility — is an important example.
Despite internal and external interest in the concept, NYC DOT conducted a mandated study using a novel hydrant zone analysis; they compared intersections where parking was prohibited due to fire hydrants against those where parking was allowed. The findings were surprising: simply clearing parking without physical barriers actually increased injuries by 30% compared to intersections with parking. Rather than abandon daylighting, NYC DOT refined the concept based on data, developing "hardened daylighting," which places physical barriers like granite blocks, planters, bike corrals, or safety bollards in the prohibited parking spaces. This data-validated approach has been implemented at approximately 300 locations citywide. By testing assumptions before scaling interventions, cities can avoid unintended consequences and develop more effective safety solutions grounded in evidence rather than popular trends.
-
How can we reduce outage rates for agency fleets without purchasing new vehicles? Under what circumstances do outages take place most frequently?
-
How can we better predict where the next street light cable failure will be?
-
Can we predict what areas have more open hydrants?
-
Where should snow removal happen first?
Cities can successfully implement changes to curb and sidewalk management by starting with a clear, compelling vision that emphasizes community benefits like improved safety and livability, then mapping stakeholders' diverse interests and engaging them through data-driven communication and feedback loops. Internally, cities must appoint a senior "idea champion" to coordinate across departments, establish technical interoperability standards, and align policies and regulations to support the new management approach. Finally, cities should launch pilot programs with clear metrics and phased implementation to demonstrate results, build momentum, and foster collaboration among departments, businesses, and residents before scaling initiatives citywide.
Public Safety
Public AI trackers that document when and how law enforcement and public safety agencies deploy AI tools help residents, journalists, and advocates understand and question AI deployments, push for safeguards, and participate more meaningfully in local debates about technology, civil rights, and public safety.
Georgetown’s Justice and Artificial Intelligence Tracker (JAI‑T), for example, compiles real-world AI use in public safety, focusing on tools actually in use, not just laws or policies. It lists specific systems, their purposes, and where they are operating, giving communities a clearer view of how AI is entering policing and justice. By systematically cataloging AI tools used in public safety and organizing them within a shared analytical framework, the JAI‑T gives decision-makers a clearer picture of where AI is used, for what purposes, and with what potential risks. This visibility allows agencies and policymakers, as well as residents, to evaluate impacts on civil liberties, equity, and governance, compare approaches across jurisdictions, and design guardrails or reforms where needed, helping align fast-moving AI deployments with ethical standards and public accountability.
Artificial Intelligence
Cities can modernize their performance management systems through StatGPT, which leverages artificial intelligence and real-time data to democratize access to performance information across the organization, allowing workers at all levels to identify trends, compare results with peers, and make data-driven improvements without specialized analytics training. StatGPT shifts accountability from a top-down model to a distributed approach where employees are empowered.
Additionally, StatGPT enables cities to move beyond agency-focused metrics to address complex, cross-sector issues by layering data from multiple agencies and collaborating with community boards to solve problems that matter most to residents.
Cities can use generative AI to democratize open data access by creating natural language interfaces that allow residents to query datasets without technical expertise. DC Compass enables residents to ask questions via voice or text in multiple languages, eliminating barriers to engagement. The tool goes further by contextualizing data (linking results to specific city initiatives and directing users to relevant department hub sites), making information actionable rather than abstract. Critical to success is partnering with GIS specialists to handle spatial analysis, since most datasets have locational components. Cities must also establish clear AI governance guided by values around equity, privacy, and safety, and invest in high-quality data and metadata standards before launching the tool. By combining natural language interfaces with strong data governance and quality datasets, cities can unlock their open data for all residents, regardless of technical background.
An agentic city is a vision of a transparent, AI-assisted city operating model where public servants and AI agents work together to transform local government and deliver more responsive, personalized, and trustworthy services to residents. In an agentic city, AI agents help both residents and city employees navigate complex processes such as permits, service requests, and administrative procedures end-to-end, freeing human workers to focus on problems that require their expertise, judgment, and experience. The agentic city modernizes government operations through intelligent collaboration between humans and AI, enabling residents to receive better services and city leaders to earn public trust.
Cities can make complex environmental and climate data more accessible to decision-makers through platforms like Climateverse, which uses conversational AI to help non-data scientists query and understand available datasets. The platform addresses a key challenge: the data needed for cities to conduct effective climate and health analysis exists but is often difficult to access due to technical barriers, data limitations, and knowledge gaps about what information is available. By using natural language processing, cities can pose questions in conversational form rather than requiring specialized data science training.
Beyond data platforms, cities should conduct tabletop exercises and simulations that bring together public health officials, emergency responders, and other stakeholders to coordinate responses to climate crises—such as extreme heat events. These exercises help cities understand the coordination required across departments and with vulnerable populations, then translate those insights into actual planning and preparedness efforts.
This post has been updated over time with additional examples. Most recent update was June 11, 2026.