The COVID-19 pandemic has both highlighted and exacerbated racial inequities. Research by McKinsey’s Center for Societal Benefit through Healthcare and others has found that COVID-19 is disproportionately affecting communities of color. Compared to white Americans, the estimated age-adjusted COVID-19 mortality rate for other American racial/ethnic groups rises sharply. It ranges from 1.5 times greater for Asian Americans to 3.8 times greater for Black Americans.
The concentration of both COVID-19 and communities of color in urban areas provides one explanation. Though it has continued its march into towns and rural areas, 90 percent of COVID-19 cases to date are concentrated in urban areas. Such urban settings also are the home of 84 percent of Black Americans and 88 percent of Hispanic/Latinx Americans.
These populations also have had greater difficulty in getting tested for the virus. Though Black and Hispanic/Latinx Americans are more likely to attempt to get tested, they are less likely to be tested – just one example of persistent racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare delivery.
In addition, the rapid pandemic-driven shift to telehealth threatens to leave communities of color even further behind in their access to healthcare. A recent study by the Mayo Clinic projects that by the end of 2020 almost all large employers will be using telemedicine as they expand access to virtual care among employees. However, community health centers, which serve a disproportionate share of low-income and racial/ethnic minority populations, have experienced difficulties with rolling out telehealth, and as a result, those populations are less likely to have access to virtual healthcare. This is further exacerbated by disparities in access to stable internet and lower rates of smartphone adoption as a result of the digital divide within and among U.S. communities.
Too many algorithms have built in bias that discriminates against minorities and other vulnerable populations. However, ethical AI, and in particular predictive data models, can help governments creating vaccine distribution plans address these many disparities to ensure that access to COVID-19 testing, telehealth, and ultimately to a vaccine is fair and equitable, provided that public accountability for algorithms is safeguarded and potential bias addressed. In order to plan for and deploy immunization, governments have to be able to distribute vaccinations and testing kits on a large scale, prioritizing those communities that are disproportionately affected by the pandemic.
This is where geographic information systems (GIS) and AI can help to identify and prioritize critical populations, identify gaps in access and alternative distribution models, and manage resources.
And, the U.S. Digital Response Team’s online dashboard, created in partnership with the Pennsylvania Department of Health to track the availability of hospital beds and ventilators on a county-by-county basis, could serve the purpose of tracing the supplies of vaccines and testing kits, and use AI and predictive analytics to help predict a population’s behavior and the risk of transmissions on a local level for different sub-populations and adjust supply to address changing hotspots.
Finally, the company Bluedot, which spotted early signals of the pandemic before anyone else, developed an AI-driven infectious disease surveillance system. Their system uses a proprietary algorithm to provide insights on the spread of infectious disease based on the analysis of data collected outside official healthcare sources, such as the worldwide movements of travelers on commercial flights; human, animal and insect population data; and local information from journalists and healthcare workers extracted from online articles. A similar model could be used by cities with the addition of data on vulnerable populations as a vector in AI-driven supply predictions.
Public officials are interested in using these and other tools to ensure an equitable distribution of vaccines. The deputy chief information officer of Los Angeles County, Jagjit Dhaliwal, is partnering with a team of MIT and Harvard students at the MIT Media Lab Global Ventures course that I mentored to brainstorm a solution to ensure equitable vaccine distribution across local pharmacies by leveraging operational and analytical models. Dhaliwal said, “…while the federal/state governments are laying out macro-strategies in partnership with global organizations for effective distribution of vaccines, we need to look at the bottom-top approach too to strengthen the on-ground operational needs of local vaccine provider agencies.” The goal is to create a AI- driven model that leverages patterns from previous epidemic situations in order to prioritize and effectively manage vaccine distribution to high-risk populations.
In fact, a data-mining company, Palantir Technologies Inc., is already working with the U.S. federal government to design the Tiberius vaccine management system. Tiberius would enable the U.S. to allocate vaccine shots to high-priority populations and identify those of the highest risk of infection.
Ultimately, state and local agencies need to efficiently manage the distribution and allocation of resources, including demand forecasting, staffing, service time, patient tracking, follow up, and tracing, and eventually, equitable vaccine access for all. AI and data analytics can help in developing a coordinated and equitable distribution response by public authorities.
About the Author
Kasia Jakimowicz
Kasia Jakimowicz is an Innovation in Government Fellow at the Ash Center and MIT Media Lab Global Ventures Mentor. She is a strategic policy advisor guiding the design, development, and implementation of global policies and programs across multinationals, entrepreneurship, public service consulting, think-tanks, UN and European Commission, at the EU and global level. She is passionate about using technology and innovation for social and economic impact with a focus on exploring how technology companies and governments can collaborate effectively. She is a recent graduate of Master in Public Administration at Harvard Kennedy School, holds a Master of Science in Economics and Business Administration (University of Aarhus), a Master in Management and Management (Warsaw School of Economics) and studied data systems and computing at University of Oxford.